WebApr 6, 2024 · Materials with n < 1 that can be used to realize such metasurfaces exist throughout the EUV; for example, aluminum, silicon, and beryllium allow optics for the wavelength range from 40 to 90 nm; scandium and boron cover 20 to 40 nm; and rhenium, molybdenum, and zirconium cover 10 to 20 nm. WebSep 20, 2024 · Biomedical Optics Express Journal Paper: Supplementary Materials. Posted on September 20, 2024 by Youngjun Cho Posted in Archive. An example clip to show the …
Applied Physics Letters
WebJan 10, 2024 · We believe that our approach opens up a novel way for light simulation and optical design of photonic devices. Maxwell’s equations describe how light propagates and interacts with materials and account for basic light properties, such as refraction, diffraction, and scattering. 1–3 1. M. WebDec 1, 2015 · The optical components of the eye are the cornea and the crystalline lens; they must be transparent and have appropriate shape and refractive indices for providing an optimal retinal image. blueberry bush no berries
Optical Materials Journal ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier
WebOct 2, 2015 · Nowadays, light beam carrying OAM can be created by using various optical elements, such as spiral phase plates ( 9 ), computer-generated holograms ( 1 ), glued hollow axicons ( 10 ), form-birefringent elements ( 11, 12 ), microscopic ring resonators ( 13 ), and two-dimensional (2D) nano-antenna arrays (the so-called metasurfaces) ( 14 – 19 ). WebNov 12, 2024 · We experimentally demonstrate the capability of such acoustic Mikaelian lens to simultaneously generate sound wave guiding and acoustic Talbot effect, which are normally two distinct ways to demonstrate wave manipulation from the aspects of geometrical and wave acoustics. WebOptics express 2014 TLDR It is shown that the use of the rigorous vectorial method allows to better predict the confinement loss of the guided modes compared to approximate methods based on equivalent in-plane bending models. Expand 21 PDF View 1 excerpt, references methods blueberry bush variety comparison